Mirza v. Tuufuli, 3:17-cv-06959-WHO. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20180201a70
Visitors: 10
Filed: Jan. 31, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 31, 2018
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND REMANDING CASE Re: Dkt. No. 5 WILLIAM H. ORRICK , District Judge . On January 10, 2018, Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that this case be remanded to Alameda County Superior Court and Tuufuli's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (IFP Application) be denied as moot. Dkt. No. 5. Objections to Judge James's recommendation were due by January 24, 2018. Fed. Rule Civ. P. 72(b); Civil L. R. 72-3
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND REMANDING CASE Re: Dkt. No. 5 WILLIAM H. ORRICK , District Judge . On January 10, 2018, Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that this case be remanded to Alameda County Superior Court and Tuufuli's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (IFP Application) be denied as moot. Dkt. No. 5. Objections to Judge James's recommendation were due by January 24, 2018. Fed. Rule Civ. P. 72(b); Civil L. R. 72-3...
More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND REMANDING CASE
Re: Dkt. No. 5
WILLIAM H. ORRICK, District Judge.
On January 10, 2018, Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that this case be remanded to Alameda County Superior Court and Tuufuli's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (IFP Application) be denied as moot. Dkt. No. 5. Objections to Judge James's recommendation were due by January 24, 2018. Fed. Rule Civ. P. 72(b); Civil L. R. 72-3. As of today's date, no objections have been filed. Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation, as well as the record in this case, I ADOPT Judge James's Report and Recommendation in full. This case is REMANDED to Alameda County Superior Court for lack of jurisdiction, and the IFP Application is DENIED as MOOT.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
