Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Newmaker v. City of Fortuna, 12-cv-04675-PJH. (2018)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20180201a88 Visitors: 17
Filed: Jan. 31, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 31, 2018
Summary: ORDER OF DISMISSAL Re: Dkt. No. 143 PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON , District Judge . The parties hereto, by their counsel, having advised the court that they have agreed to a settlement of this cause, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this cause of action is dismissed without prejudice; provided, however that if any party hereto shall certify to this court, within sixty days, with proof of service thereof on the opposing party, that the agreed consideration for said settlement has not been delivered over,
More

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Re: Dkt. No. 143

The parties hereto, by their counsel, having advised the court that they have agreed to a settlement of this cause, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this cause of action is dismissed without prejudice; provided, however that if any party hereto shall certify to this court, within sixty days, with proof of service thereof on the opposing party, that the agreed consideration for said settlement has not been delivered over, the foregoing order shall stand vacated and this cause shall forthwith be restored to the calendar to be set for trial on the next available date. The court declines to enter a stay and vacate the trial date.

If no certification is filed, after passage of sixty days, the dismissal shall be with prejudice. The parties may, of course, substitute a dismissal with prejudice at any time during this sixty day period.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer