JD Brothers LLC, v. Kirk,, 15-cv-01373-VC. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20180206a36
Visitors: 22
Filed: Feb. 05, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 05, 2018
Summary: ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO REOPEN CASE, AND DENYING MOTION TO SEAL Re: Dkt. Nos. 268, 269 VINCE CHHABRIA , District Judge . The plaintiffs' request to reopen the case is denied in part and granted in part. The prior Order of Dismissal is withdrawn, and the court will retain jurisdiction over the case to enforce the terms of the settlements with Lucy Gao, Benjamin Kirk, and Sunshine Valley LLC. Nonetheless, it appears there are no further active claims in the case
Summary: ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO REOPEN CASE, AND DENYING MOTION TO SEAL Re: Dkt. Nos. 268, 269 VINCE CHHABRIA , District Judge . The plaintiffs' request to reopen the case is denied in part and granted in part. The prior Order of Dismissal is withdrawn, and the court will retain jurisdiction over the case to enforce the terms of the settlements with Lucy Gao, Benjamin Kirk, and Sunshine Valley LLC. Nonetheless, it appears there are no further active claims in the case...
More
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO REOPEN CASE, AND DENYING MOTION TO SEAL
Re: Dkt. Nos. 268, 269
VINCE CHHABRIA, District Judge.
The plaintiffs' request to reopen the case is denied in part and granted in part. The prior Order of Dismissal is withdrawn, and the court will retain jurisdiction over the case to enforce the terms of the settlements with Lucy Gao, Benjamin Kirk, and Sunshine Valley LLC.
Nonetheless, it appears there are no further active claims in the case. Therefore, it is ORDERED that any claims that have not already been disposed of by earlier orders are DISMISSED, and that the Clerk of the Court administratively close the case. See Dkt. Nos. 254, 263, 266. The parties retain the right to reopen this action within 60 days of this Order. If a request to reopen the case is not filed and served on opposing counsel within 60 days, the dismissal of any remaining claims will be with prejudice. After the 60-day period, parties subject to settlement agreements can move to reopen the case if and when they require court intervention to enforce the terms of those agreements.
The plaintiffs' administrative motion to seal is denied because it fails to comply with the court's standing order. Moreover, some of the material that the plaintiffs propose to seal is already part of the public record. Any renewed request to seal must be filed within seven days.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
