Di-az v. Tesla Inc., 3:17-cv-06748. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20180209a32
Visitors: 9
Filed: Feb. 08, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 08, 2018
Summary: ORDER RE STIPULATION FOR BINDING ARBITRATION AND STAY OF CLAIMS WILLIAM H. ORRICK , District Judge . PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED: 1) The parties joint stipulation to Arbitrate and Stay the Case as to Patterson's claims is APPROVED and GRANTED; 2) The Court hereby retains jurisdiction to confirm and enforce the arbitration award. IT IS SO ORDERED.
ORDER RE STIPULATION FOR BINDING ARBITRATION AND STAY OF CLAIMS
WILLIAM H. ORRICK, District Judge.
PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED:
1) The parties joint stipulation to Arbitrate and Stay the Case as to Patterson's claims is APPROVED and GRANTED;
2) The Court hereby retains jurisdiction to confirm and enforce the arbitration award.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
