Filed: Feb. 13, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 13, 2018
Summary: STIPULATED REQUEST AND ORDER TO CHANGE DEADLINES FOR OPPOSITION AND REPLY BRIEFS TO DOCKET NUMBERS 234-35. WILLIAM H. ORRICK , District Judge . Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1(b), 6-2, and 7-12, Plaintiffs and Counterclaim-Defendants Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd., Huawei Device USA, Inc., Huawei Technologies USA, Inc., and HiSilicon Technologies Co., Ltd. (collectively, "Huawei") and Defendants and Counterclaim-Plaintiffs Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Sams
Summary: STIPULATED REQUEST AND ORDER TO CHANGE DEADLINES FOR OPPOSITION AND REPLY BRIEFS TO DOCKET NUMBERS 234-35. WILLIAM H. ORRICK , District Judge . Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1(b), 6-2, and 7-12, Plaintiffs and Counterclaim-Defendants Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd., Huawei Device USA, Inc., Huawei Technologies USA, Inc., and HiSilicon Technologies Co., Ltd. (collectively, "Huawei") and Defendants and Counterclaim-Plaintiffs Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsu..
More
STIPULATED REQUEST AND ORDER TO CHANGE DEADLINES FOR OPPOSITION AND REPLY BRIEFS TO DOCKET NUMBERS 234-35.
WILLIAM H. ORRICK, District Judge.
Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1(b), 6-2, and 7-12, Plaintiffs and Counterclaim-Defendants Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd., Huawei Device USA, Inc., Huawei Technologies USA, Inc., and HiSilicon Technologies Co., Ltd. (collectively, "Huawei") and Defendants and Counterclaim-Plaintiffs Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung Research America, Inc. (collectively, "Samsung"), through their respective counsel, respectfully request that the Court reschedule the deadlines for Huawei's opposition and Samsung's reply briefs to Samsung's Motion to Enjoin Huawei from Enforcing the Injunction Issued by the Intermediate People's Court of Shenzhen ("Samsung's Motion"), which was filed at Dkt. 234 (under seal) and Dkt. 235 (public version). The requested changes are as follows:
Event Current Date Proposed Date
Huawei's opposition to Samsung's Feb. 15, 2018 Feb. 19, 2018
Motion
Samsung's reply re: Samsung's Feb. 22, 2018 Feb. 28, 2018
Motion
Hearing on Samsung's Motion Mar. 14, 2018 Mar. 14, 2018
(no change)
Huawei has requested, and Samsung has agreed to the requested changes to accommodate the schedules of Huawei and its counsel. The requested changes will not have an effect on other deadlines in this case. In addition, the requested changes will still give the Court two weeks to review the parties' papers before the March 14, 2018 hearing date.
Previous Time Modifications in the Case
Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2(a), the parties state that there have been nine previous time modifications in this case: (1) a stipulation extending the time for Samsung to respond to Huawei's Complaint (Dkt. 30); (2) a stipulation and order rescheduling the initial Case Management Conference and extending the time for Samsung to respond to Huawei's Complaint (Dkt. 38); (3) a stipulation and order rescheduling the hearing date and briefing deadlines for Samsung's Partial Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 62); (4) a stipulation extending the time for Huawei to respond to Samsung's Answer and Counterclaims (Dkt. 68); (5) a stipulation and order rescheduling the hearing date and briefing deadlines for Samsung's Partial Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 83); (6) a stipulation and order rescheduling the initial claim construction disclosure dates (Dkt. 112); (7) a stipulation and order rescheduling the initial technology tutorial and claim construction dates (Dkt. 139); (8) a stipulation and order rescheduling the claim construction hearing date (Dkt. 157) and (9) an order extending the close of discovery, resetting the trial date, and adjusting intermediate deadlines (Dkt. 207).
Response deadline is revised to avoid the President's Day Holiday, when the CM/ECF system may be offline for maintenance.
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, AS MODIFIED IT IS SO ORDERED.
