Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Ciletti v. Berryhill, 3:17-CV-05646-EMC. (2018)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20180214c25 Visitors: 18
Filed: Feb. 13, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 13, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND [ PROPOSED ] ORDER FOR AN EXTESION OF TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE HIS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND REPLY EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel, that Plaintiff shall have an extension of time of an additional 18 days to file his motion for summary judgement and an additional 21 days to file his reply brief. This is the first continuance sought by Plaintiff. On October 2, 2017, the Court issue
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR AN EXTESION OF TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE HIS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND REPLY

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel, that Plaintiff shall have an extension of time of an additional 18 days to file his motion for summary judgement and an additional 21 days to file his reply brief. This is the first continuance sought by Plaintiff.

On October 2, 2017, the Court issued a Procedural Order for Social Security Review Actions. [Docket No. 5]. The Order states that Plaintiff shall file a motion for summary judgment within 28 days of service of Defendant's answer. Defendant filed the answer on January 8, 2018. [Docket No. 12]. Therefore, Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is currently due on February 5, 2018. Plaintiff seeks a brief extension of time of 18 days to file his motion for summary judgment. The new due date for Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment will be February 23, 2018.

There is good cause for this request. Plaintiff's counsel has been out sick for several days this month. Moreover, the Administrative Record in this case is larger than most Social Security cases in that it contains over 1,600 pages including over 1,300 pages of medical records. Plaintiff's counsel did not represent Plaintiff in any administrative proceedings; therefore, counsel must familiarize herself with the voluminous medical records before filing the motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff is respectfully requesting additional time up to and including February 23, 2018 to fully review the administrative record and research the issues.

With the additional time for Plaintiff to file his motion for summary judgment, the Defendant's opposition will now be due on March 23, 2018, and Plaintiff's reply brief will be due on April 6, 2018. Plaintiff's counsel respectfully requests an additional 21 days to file Plaintiff's reply brief. There is good cause for this request. Plaintiff's counsel will be out of the office and out of the country for the entire month of March and the beginning of April, returning to the office on April 9, 2018. With the 21-day extension, Plaintiff's reply brief will now be due on April 27, 2018. These requests for extensions of time are made in good faith with no intention to unduly delay the proceedings.

ORDER

APPROVED AND SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer