Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Baldasano v. County of San Benito, 3:15-CV-00331 JST. (2018)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20180223b37 Visitors: 14
Filed: Feb. 22, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO AMEND CASE SCHEDULE PER COURT ORDER (DOCKET 84) JON S. TIGAR , District Judge . IN RESPONSE TO THE COURT'S ORDER DATED FEBRUARY 13, 2018 (DOCKET 84), THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE, THROUGH THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD, 1. The Case Schedule shall be amended as follows, but only for those matters raised for the first time in the Second Amended Complaint: Proposed Deadline/Date Fact Discovery Cutoff April 27, 2018 Discl
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO AMEND CASE SCHEDULE PER COURT ORDER (DOCKET 84)

IN RESPONSE TO THE COURT'S ORDER DATED FEBRUARY 13, 2018 (DOCKET 84), THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE, THROUGH THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD,

1. The Case Schedule shall be amended as follows, but only for those matters raised for the first time in the Second Amended Complaint:

Proposed Deadline/Date Fact Discovery Cutoff April 27, 2018 Disclosure of Experts May 4, 2018 Rebuttal Experts May 11, 2018 Expert Discovery Cutoff May 25, 2018

2. All previous deadlines and dates shall remain in effect for the claims in the original and First Amended Complaint.

ORDER

The Court having granted leave for Plaintiff to file a Second Amended Complaint (Docket 84), such Second Amended Complaint having been filed (Docket 85), and the parties having stipulated to a new case schedule, the Court ORDERS that the case schedule shall be amended as follows, but only as to any new issues raised for the first time in the Second Amended Complaint:

Deadline/Date Fact Discovery Cutoff April 27, 2018 Disclosure of Experts May 4, 2018 Rebuttal Experts May 11, 2018 Expert Discovery Cutoff May 25, 2018

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer