Doe v. County of San Mateo, 15-cv-05496-WHO. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20180228b81
Visitors: 13
Filed: Feb. 27, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 27, 2018
Summary: ORDER OF DISMISSAL UPON SETTLEMENT Re: Dkt. No. 114 WILLIAM H. ORRICK , District Judge . The Court has been notified that the parties have agreed to a settlement. IT IS ORDERED that this matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and any hearings scheduled in this matter are VACATED. It is further ordered that if any party certifies to this Court, with proper notice to opposing counsel within 120 days from the date below, that settlement has not in fact occurred, this order shall be vacated and t
Summary: ORDER OF DISMISSAL UPON SETTLEMENT Re: Dkt. No. 114 WILLIAM H. ORRICK , District Judge . The Court has been notified that the parties have agreed to a settlement. IT IS ORDERED that this matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and any hearings scheduled in this matter are VACATED. It is further ordered that if any party certifies to this Court, with proper notice to opposing counsel within 120 days from the date below, that settlement has not in fact occurred, this order shall be vacated and th..
More
ORDER OF DISMISSAL UPON SETTLEMENT
Re: Dkt. No. 114
WILLIAM H. ORRICK, District Judge.
The Court has been notified that the parties have agreed to a settlement.
IT IS ORDERED that this matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and any hearings scheduled in this matter are VACATED. It is further ordered that if any party certifies to this Court, with proper notice to opposing counsel within 120 days from the date below, that settlement has not in fact occurred, this order shall be vacated and this cause shall be restored to the calendar for further proceedings. IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
