Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Liveperson, Inc. v. [24]7.ai, Inc., 3:17-CV-01268-JST. (2018)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20180302983 Visitors: 3
Filed: Mar. 01, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 01, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING LIVEPERSON'S OPPOSITION TO [24]7'S MOTION TO REDUCE THE NUMBER OF TRADE SECRETS JON S. TIGAR , District Judge . STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER Pursuant to Local Rules 6-1 and 6-2, Plaintiff LivePerson, Inc. ("LivePerson") and Defendant [24]7.ai, Inc. ("[24]7") (together, the "Parties") hereby respectfully move the Court to accept the filing of LivePerson's Opposition to [24]7's Motion to Reduce the Number of Trade Secrets and relate
More

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING LIVEPERSON'S OPPOSITION TO [24]7'S MOTION TO REDUCE THE NUMBER OF TRADE SECRETS

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER

Pursuant to Local Rules 6-1 and 6-2, Plaintiff LivePerson, Inc. ("LivePerson") and Defendant [24]7.ai, Inc. ("[24]7") (together, the "Parties") hereby respectfully move the Court to accept the filing of LivePerson's Opposition to [24]7's Motion to Reduce the Number of Trade Secrets and related exhibits, which were filed on February 26, 2018. Dkt. 353. Due to unforeseen logistical issues, LivePerson's Opposition was filed shortly after the 5 p.m. deadline agreed upon by the Parties and ordered by the Court. Dkt. 348.

ATTESTATION

Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3) I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from Darin Snyder.

PROPOSED ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer