Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Johnston v. Uber Technologies, Inc., 3:16-CV-03134-EMC. (2018)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20180307a17 Visitors: 21
Filed: Mar. 06, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 06, 2018
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . STIPULATION TO ADJOURN CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-12, Plaintiff Todd Johnston ("Plaintiff") and Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc. ("Uber") (Plaintiff and Defendant are collectively referred to as "the Parties"), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows: WHEREAS, on June 22, 2017, the Court stayed the abo
More

JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

STIPULATION TO ADJOURN CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-12, Plaintiff Todd Johnston ("Plaintiff") and Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc. ("Uber") (Plaintiff and Defendant are collectively referred to as "the Parties"), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows:

WHEREAS, on June 22, 2017, the Court stayed the above-captioned case pending the outcome of various appeals in O'Connor v. Uber Technologies, Inc., Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Case Nos. 14-16078, et al. related to the enforceability of arbitration agreements at issue in this case;

WHEREAS, on September 22, 2017, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals stayed O'Connor v. Uber Technologies, Inc., Case Nos. 14-16078, et al. pending Morris v. Ernst & Young, LLP, 834 F.3d 975 (9th Cir. 2016), cert. granted (U.S. Jan. 13, 2017) (No. 16-300) ("Morris"), consolidated with Epic Sys. Corp. v. Lewis, 823 F.3d 1147 (7th Cir. 2016), cert. granted (U.S. Jan. 13, 2017) (No. 16-285) and Murphy Oil USA, Inc. v. NLRB, 808 F.3d 1013 (5th Cir. 2015) cert. granted (U.S. Jan. 13, 2017) (No. 16-307) (collectively, "Morris, et al.");

WHEREAS, as a result of meet and confer efforts, the Parties agree that the March 22, 2018 Case Management Conference should be continued pending the United States Supreme Court's decision in Morris, et al.; and

WHEREAS, the Parties believe it would be most efficient to continue the Case Management Conference to May 17, 2018 pending a ruling in Morris, et al.

NOW THEREFORE, the Parties hereby stipulate, subject to the approval of this Court, that:

1. The Case Management Conference set for March 22, 2018, at 10:30 a.m., shall be continued to May 17, 2018.

2. Case Management Conference Statements shall be due on May 10, 2018.

3. The above-captioned case shall remain STAYED until the next Case Management Conference.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

I, Sophia Behnia, hereby attest that Mr. Davis, on whose behalf the filing is submitted, concurs in the filing's content and has authorized the filing.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

1. The Case Management Conference set for March 22, at 10:30 a.m., shall be continued to May 17, 2018 at 10:30 amp.m.

2. Case Management Conference Statements shall be due on May 10, 2018.

3. The above-captioned case shall remain STAYED until the next Case Management Conference.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer