Brian H. v. Blue Shield of California, 17-cv-03095-MMC. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20180307a23
Visitors: 20
Filed: Mar. 05, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 05, 2018
Summary: ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TO STRIKE Re: Dkt. No. 50 MAXINE M. CHESNEY , District Judge . Before the Court is defendants' "Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint, or in the Alternative, Motion to Strike," filed January 23, 2018, pursuant to Rules 12(b)(6) and 12(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, by which motion defendants seek an order dismissing plaintiffs' Second and Third Causes of Action. Plaintiffs have filed oppositio
Summary: ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TO STRIKE Re: Dkt. No. 50 MAXINE M. CHESNEY , District Judge . Before the Court is defendants' "Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint, or in the Alternative, Motion to Strike," filed January 23, 2018, pursuant to Rules 12(b)(6) and 12(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, by which motion defendants seek an order dismissing plaintiffs' Second and Third Causes of Action. Plaintiffs have filed opposition..
More
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TO STRIKE
Re: Dkt. No. 50
MAXINE M. CHESNEY, District Judge.
Before the Court is defendants' "Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint, or in the Alternative, Motion to Strike," filed January 23, 2018, pursuant to Rules 12(b)(6) and 12(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, by which motion defendants seek an order dismissing plaintiffs' Second and Third Causes of Action. Plaintiffs have filed opposition, to which defendants have replied. The matter came on regularly for hearing on March 2, 2018. Katie J. Spielman appeared on behalf of plaintiffs. Joseph E. Laska and Ketakee R. Kane appeared on behalf of defendants.
The Court having considered the parties' respective written submissions and the arguments of counsel at the hearing, as well as having explored with counsel any potentially viable basis for amendment, the motion is, for the reasons stated on the record at the hearing, hereby GRANTED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle