Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

In re Qualcomm Antitrust Litigation, 17-md-02773 LHK (NC). (2018)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20180316b48 Visitors: 5
Filed: Mar. 15, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 15, 2018
Summary: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE REGARDING QUALCOMM'S MISSING DECLARATION Re: Dkt. No. 368 NATHANAEL M. COUSINS , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiffs filed a motion to seal portions of their March 5, 2018, supplemental authority regarding the attorney-client privilege and attachments. Dkt. No. 368. The attachments to the statement are documents produced by Qualcomm that Qualcomm designated as confidential. This motion to seal is based on references to those documents in plaintiffs' statement. Plaintiffs also
More

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE REGARDING QUALCOMM'S MISSING DECLARATION

Re: Dkt. No. 368

Plaintiffs filed a motion to seal portions of their March 5, 2018, supplemental authority regarding the attorney-client privilege and attachments. Dkt. No. 368. The attachments to the statement are documents produced by Qualcomm that Qualcomm designated as confidential. This motion to seal is based on references to those documents in plaintiffs' statement. Plaintiffs also seek to seal the documents themselves, which were attached as exhibits to the statement. Qualcomm designated the documents as confidential. Qualcomm has not timely filed a declaration under Civil Local Rule 79-5(e) as required. Qualcomm must file this declaration by tomorrow, March 16, 2018.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer