In re Qualcomm Antitrust Litigation, 17-md-02773 LHK (NC). (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20180316b48
Visitors: 10
Filed: Mar. 15, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 15, 2018
Summary: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE REGARDING QUALCOMM'S MISSING DECLARATION Re: Dkt. No. 368 NATHANAEL M. COUSINS , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiffs filed a motion to seal portions of their March 5, 2018, supplemental authority regarding the attorney-client privilege and attachments. Dkt. No. 368. The attachments to the statement are documents produced by Qualcomm that Qualcomm designated as confidential. This motion to seal is based on references to those documents in plaintiffs' statement. Plaintiffs also
Summary: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE REGARDING QUALCOMM'S MISSING DECLARATION Re: Dkt. No. 368 NATHANAEL M. COUSINS , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiffs filed a motion to seal portions of their March 5, 2018, supplemental authority regarding the attorney-client privilege and attachments. Dkt. No. 368. The attachments to the statement are documents produced by Qualcomm that Qualcomm designated as confidential. This motion to seal is based on references to those documents in plaintiffs' statement. Plaintiffs also ..
More
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE REGARDING QUALCOMM'S MISSING DECLARATION
Re: Dkt. No. 368
NATHANAEL M. COUSINS, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiffs filed a motion to seal portions of their March 5, 2018, supplemental authority regarding the attorney-client privilege and attachments. Dkt. No. 368. The attachments to the statement are documents produced by Qualcomm that Qualcomm designated as confidential. This motion to seal is based on references to those documents in plaintiffs' statement. Plaintiffs also seek to seal the documents themselves, which were attached as exhibits to the statement. Qualcomm designated the documents as confidential. Qualcomm has not timely filed a declaration under Civil Local Rule 79-5(e) as required. Qualcomm must file this declaration by tomorrow, March 16, 2018.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
