Liu v. Tan, 18-cv-00054-MMC. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20180319567
Visitors: 18
Filed: Mar. 16, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 16, 2018
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND; DENYING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR AWARD OF FEES; DIRECTIONS TO CLERK Re: Dkt. Nos. 5, 10 MAXINE M. CHESNEY , District Judge . Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley's Report and Recommendation, filed February 26, 2018, by which said Magistrate Judge recommends the Court grant plaintiff's motion to remand the above-titled action to state court and deny plaintiff's request for an award of att
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND; DENYING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR AWARD OF FEES; DIRECTIONS TO CLERK Re: Dkt. Nos. 5, 10 MAXINE M. CHESNEY , District Judge . Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley's Report and Recommendation, filed February 26, 2018, by which said Magistrate Judge recommends the Court grant plaintiff's motion to remand the above-titled action to state court and deny plaintiff's request for an award of atto..
More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND; DENYING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR AWARD OF FEES; DIRECTIONS TO CLERK
Re: Dkt. Nos. 5, 10
MAXINE M. CHESNEY, District Judge.
Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley's Report and Recommendation, filed February 26, 2018, by which said Magistrate Judge recommends the Court grant plaintiff's motion to remand the above-titled action to state court and deny plaintiff's request for an award of attorney fees. response to the Report and Recommendation.
Having read and considered the Report and Recommendation, as well as the notice of removal and plaintiff's motion, the Court rules as follows:
1. The Report and Recommendation is hereby ADOPTED in its entirety;
2. Plaintiff's motion to remand is hereby GRANTED; and
3. Plaintiff's request for an award of fees is hereby DENIED.
The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to remand the above-titled action to the Superior Court of California, in and for the County of San Mateo.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
