Sims v. Scanlon, 17-cv-01905-HSG. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20180403924
Visitors: 17
Filed: Apr. 02, 2018
Latest Update: Apr. 02, 2018
Summary: ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S "MOTION TO REQUIRE DEFENDANT TO REPLY" Re: Dkt. No. 22 HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. , District Judge . Plaintiff's "motion to require defendant to reply" is DENIED as unnecessary. Defendant has timely filed a motion for summary judgment as directed by the Court in its October 31, 2017 scheduling order. The summary judgment motion is now fully briefed, and a ruling on the motion will issue by separate order. This order terminates Docket No. 22. IT IS SO ORDERED.
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S "MOTION TO REQUIRE DEFENDANT TO REPLY"
Re: Dkt. No. 22
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR., District Judge.
Plaintiff's "motion to require defendant to reply" is DENIED as unnecessary. Defendant has timely filed a motion for summary judgment as directed by the Court in its October 31, 2017 scheduling order. The summary judgment motion is now fully briefed, and a ruling on the motion will issue by separate order.
This order terminates Docket No. 22.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
