Filed: Apr. 10, 2018
Latest Update: Apr. 10, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER JON S. TIGAR , District Judge . WHEREAS, Plaintiff NAUTILUS INSURANCE COMPANY, an Arizona corporation, ("Nautilus") filed its Complaint for Declaratory Relief, Reimbursement, Equitable Indemnity and Equitable Subrogation, on January 9, 2017; WHEREAS, Defendant UNITED SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, ("United") filed a counterclaim against Nautilus for Declaratory Relief and damages, on April 20, 2017. WHEREAS, Nautilu
Summary: STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER JON S. TIGAR , District Judge . WHEREAS, Plaintiff NAUTILUS INSURANCE COMPANY, an Arizona corporation, ("Nautilus") filed its Complaint for Declaratory Relief, Reimbursement, Equitable Indemnity and Equitable Subrogation, on January 9, 2017; WHEREAS, Defendant UNITED SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, ("United") filed a counterclaim against Nautilus for Declaratory Relief and damages, on April 20, 2017. WHEREAS, Nautilus..
More
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
JON S. TIGAR, District Judge.
WHEREAS, Plaintiff NAUTILUS INSURANCE COMPANY, an Arizona corporation, ("Nautilus") filed its Complaint for Declaratory Relief, Reimbursement, Equitable Indemnity and Equitable Subrogation, on January 9, 2017;
WHEREAS, Defendant UNITED SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, ("United") filed a counterclaim against Nautilus for Declaratory Relief and damages, on April 20, 2017.
WHEREAS, Nautilus and United settled this matter on or about April 3, 2018 and each party agreed to cover their own fees and costs;
THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Nautilus and United through their designated counsel that the above-captioned action should be dismissed with prejudice as to all parties pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(2).
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
The Court having considered the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefor, orders as follows:
1. The action is dismissed with prejudice as against Defendant and Cross-Defendant pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(2).
2. Each party shall bear their own costs and attorneys' fees.
3. The Court shall retain jurisdiction over this matter to enforce the terms of the April 3, 2018, Settlement Agreement.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
