U.S. v. Nikulin, CR 16-00440 WHA. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20180412946
Visitors: 16
Filed: Apr. 11, 2018
Latest Update: Apr. 11, 2018
Summary: ORDER DENYING PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY ARKADY BUKH WILLIAM ALSUP , District Judge . The pro hac vice application of Attorney Arkady Bukh (Dkt. No. 14) is DENIED for failing to comply with Local Rule 11-3. The local rule requires that an applicant certify that "he or she is an active member in good standing of the bar of a United States Court or of the highest court of another State or the District of Columbia, specifying such bar " (emphasis added). Filling out the pro
Summary: ORDER DENYING PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY ARKADY BUKH WILLIAM ALSUP , District Judge . The pro hac vice application of Attorney Arkady Bukh (Dkt. No. 14) is DENIED for failing to comply with Local Rule 11-3. The local rule requires that an applicant certify that "he or she is an active member in good standing of the bar of a United States Court or of the highest court of another State or the District of Columbia, specifying such bar " (emphasis added). Filling out the pro ..
More
ORDER DENYING PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY ARKADY BUKH
WILLIAM ALSUP, District Judge.
The pro hac vice application of Attorney Arkady Bukh (Dkt. No. 14) is DENIED for failing to comply with Local Rule 11-3. The local rule requires that an applicant certify that "he or she is an active member in good standing of the bar of a United States Court or of the highest court of another State or the District of Columbia, specifying such bar" (emphasis added). Filling out the pro hac vice form from the district court website such that it only identifies the state of bar membership — such as "the bar of New York" — is inadequate under the local rule because it fails to identify a specific court. While the application fee does not need to be paid again, the application cannot be processed until a corrected form is submitted.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
