Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

S.P.W. v. City of Oakland, 17-cv-06884-SK. (2018)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20180417956 Visitors: 6
Filed: Apr. 16, 2018
Latest Update: Apr. 16, 2018
Summary: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Regarding Docket No. 14 SALLIE KIM , Magistrate Judge . On March 21, 2018, Defendant City of Oakland filed a motion to dismiss and noticed it for a hearing on May 7, 2018. Under Northern District of California Local Rule 7-3(a), the Plaintiff's response was due by April 4, 2018. To date, Plaintiff S.P.W. has not filed an opposition brief. Accordingly, Plaintiff is HEREBY ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why the Court should not dismiss the case for lack of prosecution or grant Def
More

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Regarding Docket No. 14

On March 21, 2018, Defendant City of Oakland filed a motion to dismiss and noticed it for a hearing on May 7, 2018. Under Northern District of California Local Rule 7-3(a), the Plaintiff's response was due by April 4, 2018. To date, Plaintiff S.P.W. has not filed an opposition brief. Accordingly, Plaintiff is HEREBY ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why the Court should not dismiss the case for lack of prosecution or grant Defendant's motion unopposed. Plaintiff's response to this Order to Show Cause is due no later than April 20, 2018.

If Plaintiff seeks to file an untimely opposition brief, Plaintiff must submit a request to do so showing good cause for the failure to comply with the deadline required by the Local Rules, and must submit the proposed opposition brief with the request. If Plaintiff fails to file a response to this Order to Show Cause by April 20, 2018, the Court shall dismiss this case without prejudice without further notice to Plaintiff.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer