Welch v. Ruiz, 18-cv-01283-JCS. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20180420866
Visitors: 32
Filed: Apr. 19, 2018
Latest Update: Apr. 19, 2018
Summary: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED JOSEPH C. SPERO , Chief Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff Anthony Welch, pro se, has not yet paid the $400 filing fee for this case. The Clerk issued a notice of non-payment on April 6, 2018 advising Welch that if he did not pay the fee within two business days, the case would be subject to termination. Welch is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why the case should not be dismissed for failure to pay the filing fee. Welch may file a response to thi
Summary: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED JOSEPH C. SPERO , Chief Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff Anthony Welch, pro se, has not yet paid the $400 filing fee for this case. The Clerk issued a notice of non-payment on April 6, 2018 advising Welch that if he did not pay the fee within two business days, the case would be subject to termination. Welch is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why the case should not be dismissed for failure to pay the filing fee. Welch may file a response to this..
More
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED
JOSEPH C. SPERO, Chief Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff Anthony Welch, pro se, has not yet paid the $400 filing fee for this case. The Clerk issued a notice of non-payment on April 6, 2018 advising Welch that if he did not pay the fee within two business days, the case would be subject to termination. Welch is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why the case should not be dismissed for failure to pay the filing fee. Welch may file a response to this order no later than May 3, 3018. The Court finds this matter suitable for resolution without oral argument and declines to set a hearing on the issue of the filing fee.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
