Trulove v. D'Amico, 16-cv-0050 YGR. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20180420876
Visitors: 13
Filed: Apr. 19, 2018
Latest Update: Apr. 19, 2018
Summary: ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART CARLA LEE HURLEY'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL Dkt. No. 547 YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS , District Judge . Carla Lee Hurley submits this administrative motion to seal portions of her response to the Court's Order to Show Cause issued on April 5, 2018 (Dkt. No. 515). 1 Hurley asserts that the matters to be sealed implicate the attorney-client privilege, and would require disclosure of attorney-client communications or work product. The Co
Summary: ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART CARLA LEE HURLEY'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL Dkt. No. 547 YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS , District Judge . Carla Lee Hurley submits this administrative motion to seal portions of her response to the Court's Order to Show Cause issued on April 5, 2018 (Dkt. No. 515). 1 Hurley asserts that the matters to be sealed implicate the attorney-client privilege, and would require disclosure of attorney-client communications or work product. The Cou..
More
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART CARLA LEE HURLEY'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
Dkt. No. 547
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS, District Judge.
Carla Lee Hurley submits this administrative motion to seal portions of her response to the Court's Order to Show Cause issued on April 5, 2018 (Dkt. No. 515).1 Hurley asserts that the matters to be sealed implicate the attorney-client privilege, and would require disclosure of attorney-client communications or work product.
The Court applies the "compelling reasons" standard to the motion to seal in connection with the Order to Show Cause as the materials submitted constitute the judicial record of these public proceedings, which should remain accessible to the public to the greatest extent possible. See Pintos v. Pacific Creditors Ass'n, 605 F.3d 665, 678 (9th Cir. 2010). Given the importance of the competing interests at stake, any sealing order must be narrowly tailored. Civ. L.R. 79-5 (a).
Therefore, the Court ORDERS as follows:
Document or Portion of Document Evidence Offered in Order
Sought to be Sealed Support of Sealing
Response at page i, line 24 Connolly Declaration ¶ GRANTED.
Response at page 1, lines 10-16, 28 Connolly Declaration GRANTED.
Response at page 2, lines 1-2, 7-8. Connolly Declaration Lines 1-2: GRANTED
Lines 7-8: GRANTED IN PART
in the sentence beginning "Sgt.
Hurley was never told . . ."
redact the two words that follow
"by [sic] Court;" otherwise,
DENIED.
Response at page 8, lines 24-25. Connolly Declaration DENIED
Response at page 9, lines 1, 11-15. Connolly Declaration DENIED
Response at page 11, line 19. Connolly Declaration DENIED
Response at page 13, lines 12-17. Connolly Declaration DENIED
Response at page 14, line 28. Connolly Declaration DENIED
Response at page 15, lines 1-3, 5-6, Connolly Declaration Lines 1-3: DENIED; otherwise,
8-9, 12-13, 17-18, 20-27. GRANTED.
Response at page 16, lines 6-10, 14. Connolly Declaration GRANTED
Response at page 19, lines 8-9, 13- Connolly Declaration Lines 13-16: DENIED;
16, 18-21, 24-25. otherwise, GRANTED.
Response at page 20, lines 1-11, 15- Connolly Declaration GRANTED.
17.
Declaration of Margaret Baumgartner Connolly Declaration; DENIED.
In Support of Response to Order to Baumgartner
Show Cause. Declaration.
Declaration of Kelly Collins In Connolly Declaration; GRANTED IN PART only as to
Support of Response to Order to Collins Declaration. paragraph 4 at lines 7-11, and
Show Cause. paragraph 6 in its entirety;
otherwise DENIED.
Declaration of Carla Lee Hurley In Connolly Declaration, GRANTED IN PART only as to
Support of Response to Order to Hurley Declaration paragraphs 9, 10, 11, and 12;
Show Cause. otherwise DENIED.
This terminates Docket No. 547.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. The Court issued its order discharging the Order to Show Cause on the record at the April 18, 2018 hearing.
Source: Leagle
