Shove v. McDonald, 14-cv-02903-JD. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20180425988
Visitors: 20
Filed: Apr. 24, 2018
Latest Update: Apr. 24, 2018
Summary: ORDER ON MOTIONS Re: Dkt. Nos. 99, 100, 103, 114, 115, 118, 121 JAMES DONATO , District Judge . This is a civil rights case brought pro se by a state prisoner. Defendants filed a motion to dismiss for failure to prosecute that is fully briefed and that the Court will review in due course. Plaintiff has filed many other miscellaneous motions. Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration (Docket No. 99) is denied for the same reasons as set forth in the prior Court order. Plaintiff's motions for a
Summary: ORDER ON MOTIONS Re: Dkt. Nos. 99, 100, 103, 114, 115, 118, 121 JAMES DONATO , District Judge . This is a civil rights case brought pro se by a state prisoner. Defendants filed a motion to dismiss for failure to prosecute that is fully briefed and that the Court will review in due course. Plaintiff has filed many other miscellaneous motions. Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration (Docket No. 99) is denied for the same reasons as set forth in the prior Court order. Plaintiff's motions for an..
More
ORDER ON MOTIONS
Re: Dkt. Nos. 99, 100, 103, 114, 115, 118, 121
JAMES DONATO, District Judge.
This is a civil rights case brought pro se by a state prisoner. Defendants filed a motion to dismiss for failure to prosecute that is fully briefed and that the Court will review in due course. Plaintiff has filed many other miscellaneous motions. Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration (Docket No. 99) is denied for the same reasons as set forth in the prior Court order. Plaintiff's motions for an in camera review (Docket No. 103), to submit evidence of obstruction of prosecution (Docket No. 114), to prosecute criminal acts (Docket No. 115) are denied as meritless and frivolous. Plaintiff's motion to compel (Docket No. 100) is denied without prejudice. If this case continues after the Court reviews the motion to dismiss for failure to prosecute, the Court will address any discovery disputes.1
For the foregoing reasons, the Court hereby orders as follows:
1. Plaintiff's motions (Docket Nos. 99, 100, 103, 114, 115, 121) are DENIED as discussed above.
2. GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, it is hereby ordered that defendants' request for an extension of time (Docket No. 118) is GRANTED and a dispositive motion shall be filed within sixty days if the Court denies the motion to dismiss for failure to prosecute.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. None of the discovery requests in the motion to compel pertain to the pending motion to dismiss.
Source: Leagle
