Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Willette v. Blue Wolf Group LLC, 3:18-cv-00829-JST. (2018)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20180504e71 Visitors: 7
Filed: May 03, 2018
Latest Update: May 03, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS JON S. TIGAR , Magistrate Judge . Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: [] Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) [x] Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) [] Private ADR ( specify process and provider ) Note: Magistrate judges do not conduct mediations unde
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:

[] Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) [x] Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) [] Private ADR (specify process and provider) Note: Magistrate judges do not conduct mediations under ADR L.R. 6. To request an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge. you must file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. Do not use this form. See Civil Local Rule I 6-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5.

The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:

[ ] the presumptive deadline (90 days from the date of the order referring the case to ADR, unless otherwise ordered.) [x] other requested deadline: 150 days from the date of the order referring the case to an ADR process, to give the parties time to engage in direct settlement discussions

[X] IT IS SO ORDERED

[] IT IS SO ORDERED WITH MODIFICATIONS.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer