Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. Vaughn, CR 17-625 RS. (2018)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20180508918 Visitors: 1
Filed: May 07, 2018
Latest Update: May 07, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION TO CONTINUANCE AND EXCLUSION OF TIME UNDER THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT, 18 U.S.C. 3161 ET. SEQ.; [PROPOSED] ORDER RICHARD SEEBORG , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties to this action, that the status hearing date of May 15, 2018, be vacated and the matter re-set for June 12, 2018. The continuance is requested because counsel for Mr. Vaughn requires additional time to review new discovery. The parties agree and stipulate that the time between May 15
More

STIPULATION TO CONTINUANCE AND EXCLUSION OF TIME UNDER THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT, 18 U.S.C. § 3161 ET. SEQ.; [PROPOSED] ORDER

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties to this action, that the status hearing date of May 15, 2018, be vacated and the matter re-set for June 12, 2018.

The continuance is requested because counsel for Mr. Vaughn requires additional time to review new discovery. The parties agree and stipulate that the time between May 15, 2018, and June 12, 2018, should be excluded under 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(7)(A) and 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(7)(B)(iv) to accommodate counsel's preparation efforts.

ORDER

The court finds that the ends of justice served by the granting of the continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy and public trial. The continuance is necessary to accommodate counsel's preparation efforts. Based on these findings, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the above-captioned matter is continued to June 12, 2018, at 2:30 p.m., before the Honorable Richard Seeborg. Time is excluded from May 15, 2018, to June 12, 2018, pursuant 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(7)(A) and 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(7)(B)(iv).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer