Moralez v. Kmart Corporation, 4:18 CV-02046 YGR. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20180509898
Visitors: 24
Filed: Apr. 27, 2018
Latest Update: Apr. 27, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS , District Judge . Counsel for the parties have met and conferred in good faith to continue the deadline for Defendants to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint ("Complaint"). Defendants have not previously sought an extension to file a responsive pleading in this matter, and this extension will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by Court Order. As such, the part
Summary: STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS , District Judge . Counsel for the parties have met and conferred in good faith to continue the deadline for Defendants to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint ("Complaint"). Defendants have not previously sought an extension to file a responsive pleading in this matter, and this extension will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by Court Order. As such, the parti..
More
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS, District Judge.
Counsel for the parties have met and conferred in good faith to continue the deadline for Defendants to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint ("Complaint"). Defendants have not previously sought an extension to file a responsive pleading in this matter, and this extension will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by Court Order. As such, the parties have agreed to extend the deadline for Defendants to respond to the complaint for thirty (30) days from April 26, 2018 to May 25, 2018.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Source: Leagle
