Resolute Forest Products, Inc. v. Greenpeace International, 17-cv-02824-JST. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20180509b97
Visitors: 3
Filed: May 08, 2018
Latest Update: May 08, 2018
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER JON S. TIGAR , District Judge . The Court has considered the parties' Stipulation Regarding Defendants Filing Replies in Support of Their Motions to Dismiss and/or Strike the Amended Complaint in Excess of the Page Limit Imposed by Local Rule 7-4. For the reasons stated therein, the Stipulation is GRANTED and the Greenpeace Defendants' reply in support of its motion to dismiss and/or strike the Amended Complaint may not exceed 30 pages; Greenpeace Fund's reply in support
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER JON S. TIGAR , District Judge . The Court has considered the parties' Stipulation Regarding Defendants Filing Replies in Support of Their Motions to Dismiss and/or Strike the Amended Complaint in Excess of the Page Limit Imposed by Local Rule 7-4. For the reasons stated therein, the Stipulation is GRANTED and the Greenpeace Defendants' reply in support of its motion to dismiss and/or strike the Amended Complaint may not exceed 30 pages; Greenpeace Fund's reply in support ..
More
[PROPOSED] ORDER
JON S. TIGAR, District Judge.
The Court has considered the parties' Stipulation Regarding Defendants Filing Replies in Support of Their Motions to Dismiss and/or Strike the Amended Complaint in Excess of the Page Limit Imposed by Local Rule 7-4. For the reasons stated therein, the Stipulation is GRANTED and the Greenpeace Defendants' reply in support of its motion to dismiss and/or strike the Amended Complaint may not exceed 30 pages; Greenpeace Fund's reply in support of its motion to dismiss and/or strike the Amended Complaint may not exceed 20 pages; and Stand's reply in support of its motion to dismiss and/or strike the Amended Complaint may not exceed 20 pages.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
