Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Hefler v. Wells Fargo & Company, 3:16-cv-05479-JST. (2018)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20180509c03 Visitors: 5
Filed: May 08, 2018
Latest Update: May 08, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT JON S. TIGAR , District Judge . WHEREAS, on April 20, 2018, the Court entered an Order scheduling a case management conference for May 23, 2018, and requiring that the parties file a case management statement by May 14, 2018; WHEREAS, the parties have now reached an agreement in principle to settle the above-entitled action; WHEREAS, Lead Plaintiff anticipates moving for preliminary a
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT

WHEREAS, on April 20, 2018, the Court entered an Order scheduling a case management conference for May 23, 2018, and requiring that the parties file a case management statement by May 14, 2018;

WHEREAS, the parties have now reached an agreement in principle to settle the above-entitled action;

WHEREAS, Lead Plaintiff anticipates moving for preliminary approval of the settlement in July 2018;

WHEREAS, the parties have met and conferred and believe that the interests of judicial efficiency and economy would be best served by continuing the case management conference scheduled for May 23, 2018, the deadline for filing a case management statement scheduled for May 14, 2018, and all other related and pending deadlines.

NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, between Lead Plaintiff, by and through its counsel, and Defendants, by and through their counsel, that:

1. The case management conference currently set for May 23, 2018, and the May 14, 2018 deadline for the parties to file a case management statement, are vacated.

2. All other current and pending deadlines in the above-captioned action are vacated, including the deadline for the parties to provide initial disclosures pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a), the deadline for the parties to provide a written discovery plan to the Court pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f), and the deadline for Defendants to answer or otherwise respond to the Second Consolidated Class Action Complaint for Violations of the Federal Securities Laws (Dkt. 207).

ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL RULE 5-1(i)(3)

In accordance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the signatories.

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer