Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Vanlengen v. Berryhill, 4:18-cv-00566-HSG. (2018)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20180509c15 Visitors: 12
Filed: May 08, 2018
Latest Update: May 08, 2018
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties, through their undersigned attorneys that, with the approval of this Court, time for Defendant to file her Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint and Certified Administrative Record (CAR) be extended by 30 days, from May 9, 2018 to June 8, 2018. There is good cause for this extension. Agency's component responsible for preparing CARs, Office of Disability Adjudica
More

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties, through their undersigned attorneys that, with the approval of this Court, time for Defendant to file her Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint and Certified Administrative Record (CAR) be extended by 30 days, from May 9, 2018 to June 8, 2018.

There is good cause for this extension. Agency's component responsible for preparing CARs, Office of Disability Adjudication and Review (ODAR), has not yet completed production of the CAR and needs additional time to prepare and produce the CAR. Defendant respectfully requests this additional time for production, review, and delivery of the copy of the CAR to the United States Attorney's Office, so that a complete record can be presented to the Court and Plaintiff.

The parties also request that all other deadlines in the Court's Scheduling Order be extended accordingly.

The parties stipulate in good faith, with no intent to prolong proceedings unduly.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer