Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. ex rel. Hollis v. Hyo Kim, 17-2839-KAW. (2018)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20180514786 Visitors: 3
Filed: May 11, 2018
Latest Update: May 11, 2018
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL KANDIS A. WESTMORE , Magistrate Judge . Pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the qui tam provisions of the False Claims Act ("FCA"), 31 U.S.C. 3730(b)(1), and in accordance with and subject to all of the terms and conditions of the settlement agreement among the United States, Relator, and Defendants, effective April 18, 2018, (the "Agreement"), the United States, Relator Kimmara Hollis ("Relator"), and Defendants
More

JOINT STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

Pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the qui tam provisions of the False Claims Act ("FCA"), 31 U.S.C. § 3730(b)(1), and in accordance with and subject to all of the terms and conditions of the settlement agreement among the United States, Relator, and Defendants, effective April 18, 2018, (the "Agreement"), the United States, Relator Kimmara Hollis ("Relator"), and Defendants Hyo Kim, Kate Kim, Francisco Coello, Francisco Coello Jr., and Sonia Dominguez ("Defendants") hereby stipulate as follows:

1. As to the United States, the claims against the Defendants are dismissed with prejudice, subject to all of the terms of the Agreement, as to the Covered Conduct released in the Agreement, and without prejudice as to any other claims. 2. As to Relator, all claims against Defendants are dismissed with prejudice, subject to all of the terms of the Agreement. Each party is to bear their own attorney's fees and costs. 3. According to the terms of the Agreement, this Court retains jurisdiction over any disputes that may arise regarding compliance with such terms. 4. A copy of the Agreement will be provided to the Court upon request.

A proposed order accompanies this notice.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

The Court directs the Clerk to close the case.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer