Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Sambora v. Bluesmart, Inc., 18-cv-01253-YGR. (2018)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20180516d17 Visitors: 4
Filed: May 15, 2018
Latest Update: May 15, 2018
Summary: ORDER GRANTING RIMON P.C.'S MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS ATTORNEY OF RECORD FOR DEFENDANT BLUESMART, INC. Re: Dkt. No. 24 YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS , District Judge . Plaintiffs Joe Sambora and William Taylor filed their original complaint in the above-captioned action on February 26, 2018. (Dkt. No. 1.) Defendant Bluesmart, Inc. ("Bluesmart") answered on April 20, 2018. (Dkt. No. 15.) Now before the Court is Rimon P.C.'s ("Rimon") motion to withdraw as attorney of record for Bluemsart on the ground
More

ORDER GRANTING RIMON P.C.'S MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS ATTORNEY OF RECORD FOR DEFENDANT BLUESMART, INC. Re: Dkt. No. 24

Plaintiffs Joe Sambora and William Taylor filed their original complaint in the above-captioned action on February 26, 2018. (Dkt. No. 1.) Defendant Bluesmart, Inc. ("Bluesmart") answered on April 20, 2018. (Dkt. No. 15.) Now before the Court is Rimon P.C.'s ("Rimon") motion to withdraw as attorney of record for Bluemsart on the ground that the attorney-client relationship between Rimon and Bluesmart has broken down. (Dkt. No. 24.) In particular, Bluesmart has not communicated with counsel since May 2, 2018, has entered into an assignment for the benefit of creditors, and has no continuing business operations. As stated on the record at the case management conference held on May 14, 2018, the Court concludes that defense counsel has thus demonstrated sufficient reasons to be relieved as counsel. Accordingly Rimon's motion is GRANTED.

"A corporation may appear in federal court only through licensed counsel." United States v. High Country Broadcasting Co., Inc., 3 F.3d 1244, 1245 (9th Cir. 1993) (citing Rowland v. California Men's Colony, 506 U.S. 194, 201-02 (1993)). Accordingly, Bluesmart is hereby ORDERED to identify substitute counsel who shall file a notice of appearance for Bluesmart by May 21, 2018, in conjunction with Bluemsart's and Bluesmart (Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors), LLC's ("Bluesmart ABC") deadline to file an answer to plaintiffs' amended complaint (Dkt. No. 26). If Bluesmart fails to do so, the Court will entertain a motion to strike Bluesmart's answer to the original complaint and for entry of default. See High Country, 3 F.3d at 1245.

The Court additionally CONTINUES Bluesmart's and Bluesmart ABC's deadline to oppose plaintiffs' motion for preliminary injunctive relief (Dkt. No. 29) to May 21, 2018. Any reply to defendants' opposition must be filed no later than May 28, 2018.

This Order terminates Docket Number 24.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer