Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. Chick, CR 18-00183 RS. (2018)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20180531948 Visitors: 12
Filed: May 30, 2018
Latest Update: May 30, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND [ PROPOSED ] ORDER SETTING HEARING DATE AND EXCLUDING TIME FROM THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT CALCULATION RICHARD SEEBORG , District Judge . Defendant, Francis Paul Chick, represented by attorney Robert Waggener, and the Government, represented by Sloan Heffron, Assistant United States Attorney, appeared before the Court on May 29, 2018 for an initial appearance in District Court and status conference. Counsel for defendant represented that additional time was needed for attorney pre
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING HEARING DATE AND EXCLUDING TIME FROM THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT CALCULATION

Defendant, Francis Paul Chick, represented by attorney Robert Waggener, and the Government, represented by Sloan Heffron, Assistant United States Attorney, appeared before the Court on May 29, 2018 for an initial appearance in District Court and status conference. Counsel for defendant represented that additional time was needed for attorney preparation.

The Court set a further status conference for June 26, 2018 at 2:30 p.m. Defendant requested that time be excluded under the Speedy Trial Act between May 29, 2018 and June 26, 2018 to conduct necessary investigation. The Government did not object to the request to exclude time.

Therefore, the parties agree, and the Court finds and holds, as follows:

1. This matter is set before this Court for a status conference on June 26, 2018.

2. The time between May 29, 2018 and June 26, 2018 is excluded under the Speedy Trial Act. Failure to grant the requested continuance would deny defense counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. See 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv). The ends of justice served by granting the requested continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial and in the prompt disposition of criminal cases. See id. § 3161(h)(7)(A).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer