Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Pham v. Board of Regents of the University of California, 18-cv-01498-WHO. (2018)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20180605834 Visitors: 9
Filed: Jun. 04, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 04, 2018
Summary: ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION, CONSOLIDATING CASES, AND SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE WILLIAM H. ORRICK , District Judge . The parties' stipulation (Dkt. No. 22) is GRANTED. Plaintiff's motion to remand (Dkt. No. 19) is withdrawn. This case is related to and consolidated with Case No. 17-cv-04194-WHO. Consequently, plaintiff will need to file a Consolidated Complaint. Plaintiff shall notify the Court by Wednesday, June 6, 2018, whether he intends to proceed on all the state claims asserted i
More

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION, CONSOLIDATING CASES, AND SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE

The parties' stipulation (Dkt. No. 22) is GRANTED.

Plaintiff's motion to remand (Dkt. No. 19) is withdrawn.

This case is related to and consolidated with Case No. 17-cv-04194-WHO.

Consequently, plaintiff will need to file a Consolidated Complaint.

Plaintiff shall notify the Court by Wednesday, June 6, 2018, whether he intends to proceed on all the state claims asserted in the existing Complaint filed in this case. If so, the Court will rule on the fully briefed and argued motion to dismiss the state law claims, and in that order will set a date for the filing of the Consolidated Complaint.

If plaintiff intends to drop some of the existing state law claims or believes that further factual amendment is required to state some of his state law claims (in light of defendants' motion to dismiss), he shall notify the Court of that by Wednesday, June 6, 2018, and his Consolidated Amended Complaint shall be filed on or before June 18, 2018.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer