Filed: Jun. 04, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 04, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANT SYMANTEC'S MOTION TO DISMISS EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . STIPULATION WHEREAS, on April 2, 2018, Plaintiff Montgomery Beyer ("Plaintiff") filed a complaint ("Complaint") in this matter; WHEREAS, on April 23, 2018, Defendant Symantec Corporation ("Symantec") filed a stipulation to extend Symantec's time to respond to the Complaint from April 25, 2018 to May 25, 2018 (ECF No. 15); WHEREAS, Symantec filed i
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANT SYMANTEC'S MOTION TO DISMISS EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . STIPULATION WHEREAS, on April 2, 2018, Plaintiff Montgomery Beyer ("Plaintiff") filed a complaint ("Complaint") in this matter; WHEREAS, on April 23, 2018, Defendant Symantec Corporation ("Symantec") filed a stipulation to extend Symantec's time to respond to the Complaint from April 25, 2018 to May 25, 2018 (ECF No. 15); WHEREAS, Symantec filed it..
More
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANT SYMANTEC'S MOTION TO DISMISS
EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge.
STIPULATION
WHEREAS, on April 2, 2018, Plaintiff Montgomery Beyer ("Plaintiff") filed a complaint ("Complaint") in this matter;
WHEREAS, on April 23, 2018, Defendant Symantec Corporation ("Symantec") filed a stipulation to extend Symantec's time to respond to the Complaint from April 25, 2018 to May 25, 2018 (ECF No. 15);
WHEREAS, Symantec filed its Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint on May 25, 2018 (ECF No. 17);
WHEREAS, pursuant to N.D. Cal. Civil Local Rule 7-3, Plaintiff's opposition to the Motion to Dismiss must be filed and served by June 8, 2018, and Symantec's reply must be filed and served not more than 7 days thereafter;
WHEREAS, Plaintiff requires additional time to submit his opposition due to substantial overlapping deadlines, and requested Symantec's agreement to a modified briefing schedule;
WHEREAS, the parties agree to an enlargement of time as to the briefing schedule, with the July 12, 2018 hearing date remaining as noticed;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the undersigned counsel for the parties, subject to Court approval that:
1. The time for Plaintiff to oppose Symantec's Motion to Dismiss shall be extended from June 8, 2018 to June 18, 2018;
2. Symantec shall file its reply brief by June 29, 2018; and
3. The hearing date for Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, currently noticed for July 12, 2018, shall maintain and will not be continued.
The parties respectfully request that the Court enter an Order approving this Stipulation.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
ATTESTATION
I, Willem F. Jonckheer, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used to file this STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANT SYMANTEC'S MOTION TO DISMISS. In compliance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that all signatories have concurred in this filing.
By: /s/Willem F. Jonckheer
Willem F. Jonckheer
[PROPOSED] ORDER
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
