Filed: Jun. 05, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 05, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND [ PROPOSED ] ORDER TO EXTEND PAGE LIMITS FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION BRIEFING (modified) EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . WHEREAS, under the Court-ordered schedule (Dkt. 300), Class Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification is due on June 6, 2018; the oppositions of Defendants Fiat Chrysler Automobiles N.V., FCA US LLC, Sergio Marchionne, VM Motori S.p.A., and VM North America, Inc. (together, the "FCA Defendants") and Robert Bosch GmbH and Robert Bosch LLC (together, the
Summary: STIPULATION AND [ PROPOSED ] ORDER TO EXTEND PAGE LIMITS FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION BRIEFING (modified) EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . WHEREAS, under the Court-ordered schedule (Dkt. 300), Class Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification is due on June 6, 2018; the oppositions of Defendants Fiat Chrysler Automobiles N.V., FCA US LLC, Sergio Marchionne, VM Motori S.p.A., and VM North America, Inc. (together, the "FCA Defendants") and Robert Bosch GmbH and Robert Bosch LLC (together, the "..
More
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND PAGE LIMITS FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION BRIEFING (modified)
EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge.
WHEREAS, under the Court-ordered schedule (Dkt. 300), Class Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification is due on June 6, 2018; the oppositions of Defendants Fiat Chrysler Automobiles N.V., FCA US LLC, Sergio Marchionne, VM Motori S.p.A., and VM North America, Inc. (together, the "FCA Defendants") and Robert Bosch GmbH and Robert Bosch LLC (together, the "Bosch Defendants") (collectively, "Defendants") are due on July 23, 2018; and Class Plaintiffs' reply brief in support of their Motion is due on August 20, 2018;
WHEREAS, all parties believe that, to adequately address the relevant class certification issues, they will require more pages than the default amount of pages permitted under the Local Rules; and
WHEREAS, following a meet-and-confer process, the parties do not oppose and agree to the page-limit extensions proposed herein.
IT IS THEREFORE STIPULATED AND AGREED by the Parties, through their respective counsel of record, that, subject to the Court's approval, (1) Class Plaintiffs shall have up to 50 pages for their brief in support of class certification; (2) the FCA Defendants and the Bosch Defendants shall have up to 100 pages in the aggregate for their briefs in opposition to class certification, to be divided between the FCA Defendants and the Bosch Defendants as appropriate and to avoid duplication; and (3) Class Plaintiffs shall have up to 50 pages for their reply in support of class certification.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
ATTESTATION (CIVIL LOCAL RULE 5-1(i)(3))
In accordance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest the concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the signatories.
[PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING PAGE LIMITS
Based on the foregoing Stipulation, the Court ORDERS as following:
(1) Class Plaintiffs shall have up to 50 pages for their brief in support of class certification;
(2) the FCA Defendants and the Bosch Defendants shall have up to 70 pages in the aggregate for their briefs in opposition to class certification, to be divided between the FCA Defendants and the Bosch Defendants as appropriate and to avoid duplication; and
(3) Class Plaintiffs shall have up to 35 pages for their reply in support of class certification.
