Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Sparks-Magdaluyo v. New Penn Financial, LLC, 16-cv-04223-MEJ. (2018)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20180625697 Visitors: 20
Filed: Jun. 22, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 22, 2018
Summary: ORDER VACATING JUNE 28, 2018 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE MARIA-ELENA JAMES , Magistrate Judge . The Court scheduled a case management conference in this matter for June 28, 2018 and ordered the parties to submit a joint case management statement by June 21, 2018. Dkt. No. 60 at 7; see Certificate of Service, Dkt. No. 60-1. On June 21, 2018, Defendant New Penn Financial, LLC dba Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing filed a unilateral case management statement. Defs. CMC Stmt,
More

ORDER VACATING JUNE 28, 2018 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

The Court scheduled a case management conference in this matter for June 28, 2018 and ordered the parties to submit a joint case management statement by June 21, 2018. Dkt. No. 60 at 7; see Certificate of Service, Dkt. No. 60-1. On June 21, 2018, Defendant New Penn Financial, LLC dba Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing filed a unilateral case management statement. Defs. CMC Stmt, Dkt. No. 61. Defendant represents it

prepared and circulated a draft Report to Plaintiffs by e-mail on June 20, 2018. Defendant also asked Plaintiffs for a phone number to meet and confer because Plaintiffs had not previously provided a phone number to Defendant's knowledge. As of the date of this filing, Defendant has not received a response from Plaintiff.

Id. at 1. As of the date of this Order, Plaintiffs have not filed a statement of their own.

Accordingly, the Court VACATES the June 28, 2018 conference. The Court further ORDERS Plaintiffs to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with Court deadlines. Plaintiffs shall file their declaration(s) no later than July 12, 2018.

The Court warns Plaintiffs that failure to file a written response will be deemed an admission that Plaintiffs do not intend to prosecute, and the case will be dismissed without prejudice. Thus, it is imperative that the Court receive a written response by the deadline above.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer