Elawyers Elawyers

Mazzini v. Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA, 3:18-cv-01574-EMC. (2018)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20180625704 Visitors: 10
Filed: Jun. 22, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 22, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEFENDANT'S DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS' COMPLAINT AND CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND ALL RELATED DEADLINES EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . WHEREAS, Plaintiffs Bridget Mazzini, Patricia J. Pawlak, and Joeseph Andris ("Plaintiffs") filed a Complaint against Defendant Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA ("Norwegian Air") on March 13, 2018, and served Norwegian Air with their Complaint on or around March 23, 2018; WHEREAS, on April 6, 2018, the parties submitted a
More

STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEFENDANT'S DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS' COMPLAINT AND CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND ALL RELATED DEADLINES

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs Bridget Mazzini, Patricia J. Pawlak, and Joeseph Andris ("Plaintiffs") filed a Complaint against Defendant Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA ("Norwegian Air") on March 13, 2018, and served Norwegian Air with their Complaint on or around March 23, 2018;

WHEREAS, on April 6, 2018, the parties submitted a stipulation extending Norwegian Air's deadline to respond to the Complaint to June 15, 2018 (Dkt. 10);

WHEREAS, on May 23, 2018 this matter was reassigned to Judge Edward M. Chen for all further proceedings (Dkt. 19);

WHEREAS, on May 31, 2018, the Court rescheduled the Case Management Conference from June 12, 2018 to July 12, 2018 (Dkt. 20); and

WHEREAS, the parties are currently engaged in settlement discussions with the hope of reaching a resolution without the need for further litigation and would like to avoid the time and expense of litigation activities while they complete those discussions;

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between Plaintiffs and Norwegian Air, through their respective counsel, that:

1. Norwegian Air shall have an extension of time up to and including September 7, 2018, to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint. 2. The Case Management Conference currently scheduled for July 12, 2018 is rescheduled for September 13, 2018, or another date that is convenient for the Court. 3. Consistent with the Court's May 31, 2018 scheduling order (Dkt. 20), the parties shall file a joint case management conference statement one week in advance of the new Case Management Conference date. 4. Pursuant to the Court's March 14, 2018 scheduling order (Dkt. 5), all other deadlines are continued accordingly, as follows: a. 21 days before the new Case Management Conference shall be the last day for the parties to: i. meet and confer re initial disclosures, early settlement, ADR process selection, and discovery plan; ii. file ADR Certification signed by Parties and Counsel; and iii. file either Stipulation to ADR Process or Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. b. 7 days before the new Case Management Conference shall be the last day for the parties to: i. file Rule 26(f) Report; and ii. complete initial disclosures or state objection in Rule 26(f) Report.

ATTESTATION STATEMENT

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3), I attest that the other signatory listed, and on whose behalf the filing is submitted, concurs in the filing's content and has authorized the filing.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer