U.S. v. Chick, CR 18-00183 RS. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20180627893
Visitors: 19
Filed: Jun. 26, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 26, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING HEARING DATE AND EXCLUDING TIME FROM THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT CALCULATION RICHARD SEEBORG , District Judge . The parties appeared before the Court on June 26, 2018 for a status conference. The defendant was present and represented by attorney Robert Waggener. The government was represented by Assistant United States Attorney Sloan Heffron. Counsel for defendant represented that additional time was needed for attorney preparation. The Court set a f
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING HEARING DATE AND EXCLUDING TIME FROM THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT CALCULATION RICHARD SEEBORG , District Judge . The parties appeared before the Court on June 26, 2018 for a status conference. The defendant was present and represented by attorney Robert Waggener. The government was represented by Assistant United States Attorney Sloan Heffron. Counsel for defendant represented that additional time was needed for attorney preparation. The Court set a fu..
More
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING HEARING DATE AND EXCLUDING TIME FROM THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT CALCULATION
RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge.
The parties appeared before the Court on June 26, 2018 for a status conference. The defendant was present and represented by attorney Robert Waggener. The government was represented by Assistant United States Attorney Sloan Heffron. Counsel for defendant represented that additional time was needed for attorney preparation.
The Court set a further status conference for July 31, 2018 at 2:30 p.m. Counsel for defendant requested that time be excluded under the Speedy Trial Act between June 26, 2018 and July 31, 2018 to ensure effective preparation. The Government did not object to the request to exclude time.
Therefore, the parties agree, and the Court finds and holds, as follows:
1. This matter is set before this Court for a status conference on July 31, 2018.
2. The time between June 26, 2018 and July 31, 2018 is excluded under the Speedy Trial Act. Failure to grant the requested continuance would deny defense counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. See 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv). The ends of justice served by granting the requested continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial and in the prompt disposition of criminal cases. See id. § 3161(h)(7)(A).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
