Telecom Asset Management, LLC v. FiberLight, LLC, 14-cv-00728-SI. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20180702835
Visitors: 13
Filed: Jun. 29, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 29, 2018
Summary: ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO ENFORCE JUDGMENT Re: Dkt. No. 224 SUSAN ILLSTON , District Judge . On June 29, 2018, the parties appeared before the Court for a hearing on plaintiff's motion to enforce judgment. (Dkt. No. 224). At this time, the full amount of the judgment, including interest to the date of payment, has been paid to plaintiff. The Court does not find it appropriate to award any alleged consequential damages or attorneys' fees. Accordingly, the motion to enforce judgmen
Summary: ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO ENFORCE JUDGMENT Re: Dkt. No. 224 SUSAN ILLSTON , District Judge . On June 29, 2018, the parties appeared before the Court for a hearing on plaintiff's motion to enforce judgment. (Dkt. No. 224). At this time, the full amount of the judgment, including interest to the date of payment, has been paid to plaintiff. The Court does not find it appropriate to award any alleged consequential damages or attorneys' fees. Accordingly, the motion to enforce judgment..
More
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO ENFORCE JUDGMENT
Re: Dkt. No. 224
SUSAN ILLSTON, District Judge.
On June 29, 2018, the parties appeared before the Court for a hearing on plaintiff's motion to enforce judgment. (Dkt. No. 224). At this time, the full amount of the judgment, including interest to the date of payment, has been paid to plaintiff. The Court does not find it appropriate to award any alleged consequential damages or attorneys' fees. Accordingly, the motion to enforce judgment is DENIED AS MOOT, and the further motion for consequential damages and fees is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
