Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

In re Volkswagen "Clean Diesel" Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability Litigation, 2672 CRB (JSC). (2018)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20180702836 Visitors: 6
Filed: Jun. 29, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 29, 2018
Summary: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE REGARDING MOTION TO ENFORCE INJUNCTION AGAINST SETTLEMENT CLASS MEMBER MARIA LUISA MACIEL CHARLES R. BREYER , District Judge . Pursuant to the Court-approved 2.0-liter class action settlement agreement, all persons who owned or leased an eligible Volkswagen vehicle as of September 18, 2015, and who did not opt out of the settlement agreement, agreed to release all claims, whether known or unknown, against Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. ("VWGoA") and any Volkswagen Dea
More

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE REGARDING MOTION TO ENFORCE INJUNCTION AGAINST SETTLEMENT CLASS MEMBER MARIA LUISA MACIEL

Pursuant to the Court-approved 2.0-liter class action settlement agreement, all persons who owned or leased an eligible Volkswagen vehicle as of September 18, 2015, and who did not opt out of the settlement agreement, agreed to release all claims, whether known or unknown, against Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. ("VWGoA") and any Volkswagen Dealers "arising from or in any way related to the 2.0-liter TDI Matter." (Dkt. No. 1685 §§ 9.2, 9.3.) In the order approving the 2.0-liter settlement agreement, the Court enjoined class members from commencing or pursing released claims in any judicial proceeding. (See Dkt. No. 2102 at 47 ¶ 9.)

On June 4, 2018, VWGoA filed a motion to enforce the 2.0-liter settlement release against Maria Luisa Maciel. VWGoA asserts that Ms. Maciel is a member of the 2.0-liter settlement class, and that in breach of the release she is pursuing a claim related to the 2.0-liter TDI Matter against VWGoA and Ancira Volkswagen of Laredo, a Volkswagen Dealer, in Texas state court. VWGoA requests that the Court enjoin Ms. Maciel from continuing to prosecute her state court suit. Counsel for Ms. Maciel has not filed an opposition to VWGoA's motion and the deadline for filing one has now passed.

The Court has reviewed VWGoA's filing, which includes a copy of Ms. Maciel's state court complaint and copies of certain emails between her counsel and counsel for VWGoA. (See Dkt. No. 5068.) The Court has also reviewed the list of 2.0-liter settlement opt-outs. (See Dkt. No. 2102-1.) Ms. Maciel is not shown as an opt-out on that list, and from the allegations in her state court complaint it appears that she is a 2.0-liter settlement class member and that she is pursuing a released claim against VWGoA and Ancira Volkswagen of Laredo.

Based on the record, the Court is inclined to grant the motion and to invoke its authority under the All Writs Act to enjoin Ms. Maciel from continuing to prosecute her state court suit against VWGoA and Ancira Volkswagen of Laredo. See Keith v. Volpe, 118 F.3d 1386, 1390 (9th Cir. 1997) ("[T]he All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651, empowers the federal courts to enjoin state proceedings that interfere, derogate, or conflict with federal judgments, orders, or settlements."). Before doing so, the Court ORDERS Ms. Maciel's counsel to show cause, if any, for why the injunction should not be entered. VWGoA shall serve this order on Ms. Maciel's counsel and file proof of service with the Court. Ms. Maciel's counsel shall have 14 days after the date of service to answer in a filing before the Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer