Gonzales v. Berryhill, 4:17-cv-06855. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20180706774
Visitors: 18
Filed: Jul. 05, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 05, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER AS MODIFIFED KANDIS A. WESTMORE , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff and Defendant, through their respective attorneys, hereby stipulate that Plaintiff shall have a thirty (30) day extension of time until August 3 4 , 2018, in which to e-file his Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendant shall file any opposition, including cross-motion, on or before September 4 3 , 2018. This extension is necessitated due to Plaintiff's counsel's upcoming schedule of administrative he
Summary: STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER AS MODIFIFED KANDIS A. WESTMORE , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff and Defendant, through their respective attorneys, hereby stipulate that Plaintiff shall have a thirty (30) day extension of time until August 3 4 , 2018, in which to e-file his Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendant shall file any opposition, including cross-motion, on or before September 4 3 , 2018. This extension is necessitated due to Plaintiff's counsel's upcoming schedule of administrative hea..
More
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER AS MODIFIFED
KANDIS A. WESTMORE, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff and Defendant, through their respective attorneys, hereby stipulate that Plaintiff shall have a thirty (30) day extension of time until August 34, 2018, in which to e-file his Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendant shall file any opposition, including cross-motion, on or before September 43, 2018. This extension is necessitated due to Plaintiff's counsel's upcoming schedule of administrative hearings and district court briefs due. Plaintiff makes this request in good faith with no intention to unduly delay the proceedings. Defendant has no objection and has stipulated to the requested relief.
This is the second extension in this case. No further extensions will be granted for plaintiff.
IT IS ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
