Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Ashker v. Governor of the State of California, 4:09-cv-05796-CW. (2018)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20180709933 Visitors: 11
Filed: Jul. 06, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 06, 2018
Summary: CLASS ACTION ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL ROBERT M. ILLMAN , Magistrate Judge . The Court has received Plaintiffs' Administrative Motion to File Under Seal, and the Declaration of Carmen E. Bremer in support of the same. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5(a), Plaintiffs have shown that the portions of the documents to be sealed are entitled to protection under the law because they contain confidential information that Defendants claim could harm CDCR i
More

CLASS ACTION

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL

The Court has received Plaintiffs' Administrative Motion to File Under Seal, and the Declaration of Carmen E. Bremer in support of the same. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5(a), Plaintiffs have shown that the portions of the documents to be sealed are entitled to protection under the law because they contain confidential information that Defendants claim could harm CDCR institutional safety and security if disclosed. See Dugan v. Lloyds TSB Bank, PLC, No. 12-cv-02549-WHA (NJV), 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 51162, at *5 (N.D. Cal. Apr. 9, 2013) (finding that good cause may exist to seal records "if disclosure of the information might harm a litigant's competitive standing"). Plaintiffs have met the "good cause" standard for sealing portions of the Declaration of Carmen E. Bremer in Support of Plaintiffs' Reply in Support of Motion for De Novo Review of Dispositive Matter Referred to Magistrate Judge Regarding Production of Documents Required by Settlement Agreement ("Bremer Reply Declaration"), together with Exhibit A thereto, because Plaintiffs have shown that they contain confidential information that Defendants claim would harm institutional safety and security, and would further compromise ongoing investigations of alleged prison gang activity if disclosed. See Kamakana v. City & Cnty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1179 (9th Cir. 2006).

Having considered Plaintiffs' Administrative Motion to File Under Seal and the Declaration of Carmen E. Bremer in support of same, and good cause appearing therefor, Plaintiffs' Motion is hereby GRANTED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer