Tolliver v. Crane Carrier, 4:18-cv-01078-KAW. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20180711a67
Visitors: 7
Filed: Jul. 10, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 10, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION REGARDING PLAINTIFFS MARY TOLLIVER AND JOHNNY TOLLIVER, JR.'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; [PROPOSED] ORDER KANDIS A. WESTMORE , Magistrate Judge . STIPULATION IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and among the parties, plaintiffs MARY TOLLIVER, as heir to and representative of the ESTATE OF JOHNNY TOLLIVER, SR.; JOHNNY TOLLIVER, JR. as surviving child of JOHNNY TOLLIVER, SR. ("Plaintiffs"), and defendant ILLINOIS TOOL WORKS INC., the answering party on behalf of named Defe
Summary: STIPULATION REGARDING PLAINTIFFS MARY TOLLIVER AND JOHNNY TOLLIVER, JR.'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; [PROPOSED] ORDER KANDIS A. WESTMORE , Magistrate Judge . STIPULATION IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and among the parties, plaintiffs MARY TOLLIVER, as heir to and representative of the ESTATE OF JOHNNY TOLLIVER, SR.; JOHNNY TOLLIVER, JR. as surviving child of JOHNNY TOLLIVER, SR. ("Plaintiffs"), and defendant ILLINOIS TOOL WORKS INC., the answering party on behalf of named Defen..
More
STIPULATION REGARDING PLAINTIFFS MARY TOLLIVER AND JOHNNY TOLLIVER, JR.'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; [PROPOSED] ORDER
KANDIS A. WESTMORE, Magistrate Judge.
STIPULATION
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and among the parties, plaintiffs MARY TOLLIVER, as heir to and representative of the ESTATE OF JOHNNY TOLLIVER, SR.; JOHNNY TOLLIVER, JR. as surviving child of JOHNNY TOLLIVER, SR. ("Plaintiffs"), and defendant ILLINOIS TOOL WORKS INC., the answering party on behalf of named Defendant Crane Carrier ("ITW"), by and through their respective counsel, as follows:
1. ITW's Answer to Plaintiffs' Complaint is deemed to be ITW's Answer to Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint;
2. ITW is not required to file any additional Answer to Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint.
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Having reviewed the foregoing Stipulation by and among Plaintiffs and Defendant IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AS FOLLOWS:
1. ITW's Answer to Plaintiffs' Complaint is deemed to be ITW's Answer to Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint;
2. ITW is not required to file any additional Answer to Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
