Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Mocha Mill, Inc. v. Port of Mokha, Inc., 4:18-CV-02539-HSG. (2018)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20180712838 Visitors: 8
Filed: Jul. 11, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 11, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING PAGE LIMITS ON MOTION TO DISMISS HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. , District Judge . WHEREAS, on April 30, 2018, Plaintiffs filed their Complaint in this action, see ECF No. 1; WHEREAS, on June 4, 2018, Plaintiffs file an Amended Complaint in this action, ECF No. 24; WHEREAS, the parties to this action have previously stipulated to, and the Court has ordered, an extended briefing schedule on forthcoming motions to dismiss to be filed by the defend
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING PAGE LIMITS ON MOTION TO DISMISS

WHEREAS, on April 30, 2018, Plaintiffs filed their Complaint in this action, see ECF No. 1;

WHEREAS, on June 4, 2018, Plaintiffs file an Amended Complaint in this action, ECF No. 24;

WHEREAS, the parties to this action have previously stipulated to, and the Court has ordered, an extended briefing schedule on forthcoming motions to dismiss to be filed by the defendants, with the motions to be heard on September 27, 2108, see ECF Nos. 22, 25 & 26, 29 & 31;

WHEREAS, the Amended Complaint asserts thirteen separate causes of action against each of Defendants Port of Mokha, Inc., Port of Mokha, LLC, Mokha Foundation, Mokhtar Alkhanshali, and Ibrahim Ahmad Ibrahim ("Stipulating Defendants");

WHEREAS, in order to provide the Court with sufficient briefing and background to respond to the Amended Complaint on behalf of the Stipulating Defendants, undersigned counsel for the Stipulating Defendants requests leave to file a memorandum in support of their motion to dismiss that exceeds the default page limits set forth in Northern District Civil Local Rules 7-2 and 7-3;

WHEREAS, undersigned counsel for the Stipulating Defendants and for Plaintiffs have met and conferred and have agreed to the filing of overlength briefs as follows;

NOW, THEREFORE, the Stipulating Defendants and Plaintiffs hereby stipulate and agree that the page limits with respect to Stipulating Defendants' forthcoming motion to dismiss shall be enlarged as follows: forty (40) pages for Stipulating Defendants' opening brief, forty pages (40) for Plaintiffs' opposition brief, and twenty (20) pages for Stipulating Defendants' reply brief.

[PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING PAGE LIMITS

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION between Plaintiffs and Defendants Port of Mokha, Inc., Port of Mokha, LLC, Mokha Foundation, Mokhtar Alkhanshali, and Ibrahim Ahmad Ibrahim ("Stipulating Defendants"), the limits on Stipulating Defendants' motion to dismiss shall be forty (40) pages for the opening brief, forty (40) pages for the opposition brief, and twenty (20) pages for the reply brief.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer