Filed: Jul. 12, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 12, 2018
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO COMPLETE COURT ORDERED MEDIATION REQUIRED BY GENERAL ORDER 56; [PROPOSED] ORDER JON S. TIGAR , District Judge . Plaintiff Francisca Moralez ("Plaintiff"), and Defendant, California Check Cashing Stores, LLC ("Defendant," and together with Plaintiff, "the Parties"), 1 by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate as follows: 1. This action arises out of Plaintiff's claims that Defendant denied her full and equal access to its public
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO COMPLETE COURT ORDERED MEDIATION REQUIRED BY GENERAL ORDER 56; [PROPOSED] ORDER JON S. TIGAR , District Judge . Plaintiff Francisca Moralez ("Plaintiff"), and Defendant, California Check Cashing Stores, LLC ("Defendant," and together with Plaintiff, "the Parties"), 1 by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate as follows: 1. This action arises out of Plaintiff's claims that Defendant denied her full and equal access to its public ..
More
JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO COMPLETE COURT ORDERED MEDIATION REQUIRED BY GENERAL ORDER 56; [PROPOSED] ORDER
JON S. TIGAR, District Judge.
Plaintiff Francisca Moralez ("Plaintiff"), and Defendant, California Check Cashing Stores, LLC ("Defendant," and together with Plaintiff, "the Parties"),1 by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate as follows:
1. This action arises out of Plaintiff's claims that Defendant denied her full and equal access to its public accommodation on account of her disabilities in violation of Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA") and parallel California law. Plaintiff seeks injunctive relief under federal and California law, as well as damages under California law. This matter therefore proceeds under this district's General Order 56 which governs ADA access matters.
2. Pursuant to this district's General Order 56, the Parties conducted a joint site inspection of the subject property on March 16, 2018. The case was then referred to mediation on April 13, 2018. This Court ordered the Parties to conduct mediation on or before July 12, 2018 (Dkt. 25), assigning the matter to Mediator Kari Levine on May 23, 2018. Dkt. 26.
3. Despite their best efforts to find a mutually convenient date for mediation prior to the July 12, 2018 deadline, there were no dates prior to that date on which all of the parties and their respective counsel of record were available.
4. The parties and mediator have performed an exhaustive review of their respective calendars, and have circulated many potential dates for the mediation. The first date on which all of the parties, their counsel and the mediator are available for mediation is September 11, 2018.
5. Accordingly, the Parties stipulate to extend the deadline to conduct mediation to September 11, 2018.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
ATTESTATION
Concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the individual(s) whose electronic signature is attributed above.
PROPOSED] ORDER
The Parties having so stipulated and good cause appearing,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the deadline for the Parties to conduct mediation is extended to September 11, 2018, with all dates triggered by that deadline continued accordingly.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
