Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

The Successor Agency to the Former Emeryville Redevelopment Agency v. Swagelok Company, 17-cv-00308-WHO. (2018)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20180717696 Visitors: 20
Filed: Jul. 16, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 16, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER BY PLAINTIFFS, SWAGELOK COMPANY, CATHERINE LENNON LOZICK, WHITNEY RESEARCH TOOL CO., AND SPECIALLY APPEARING PARTY HANSON BUILDING MATERIALS LIMITED REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING DATE FOR HANSON'S MOTION TO DISMISS WILLIAM H. ORRICK , District Judge . Plaintiffs The Successor Agency to the former Emeryville Redevelopment Agency and the City of Emeryville (collectively, "Plaintiffs"), Defendants Swagelok Company ("Swagelok"), Catherine Lennon Lozick ("Lozick")
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER BY PLAINTIFFS, SWAGELOK COMPANY, CATHERINE LENNON LOZICK, WHITNEY RESEARCH TOOL CO., AND SPECIALLY APPEARING PARTY HANSON BUILDING MATERIALS LIMITED REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING DATE FOR HANSON'S MOTION TO DISMISS

Plaintiffs The Successor Agency to the former Emeryville Redevelopment Agency and the City of Emeryville (collectively, "Plaintiffs"), Defendants Swagelok Company ("Swagelok"), Catherine Lennon Lozick ("Lozick"), Whitney Research Tool Co. ("Whitney"), and specially appearing party Hanson Building Materials Limited ("HBML") (collectively, the "Parties"), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

WHEREAS, on October 4, 2017, pursuant to stipulation of the Parties, the Court entered an Order setting a briefing schedule and hearing date on HBML's motion to dismiss Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint and related crossclaims under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2) for lack of personal jurisdiction (Dkt No. 66);

WHEREAS, pursuant to that Order, HBML's motion to dismiss would be filed on or before December 4, 2017, any opposition(s) would be filed on or before June 4, 2018, and any reply(ies) by HBML would be filed on or before June 25, 2018, and a hearing would be held on July 11, 2018;

WHEREAS, on December 4, 2017, HBML filed its motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 82);

WHEREAS, on May 8, 2018, Plaintiffs, Swagelok, Lozick, and Whitney filed a Joint Administrative Motion to Continue the Date for Hearing and Enlarge the Time for Briefing for a Period of 120 Days on Defendant and Cross-Defendant Hanson Building Materials Limited's Motion to Dismiss [Dkt. No. 82] Pursuant to Local Rule 6-3 (Dkt. No. 98);

WHEREAS, on May 14, 2018, HBML filed its Opposition to the Joint Administrative Motion to Continue the Hearing and to Enlarge the Time for Briefing for a Period of 120 Days (Dkt. No. 99);

WHEREAS, on May 15, 2018, the Court entered an Order Granting in Part Joint Administrative Motion to Continue the Date for Hearing and Enlarge the Time for Briefing for a Period of 60 Days on Defendant and Cross-Defendant Hanson Building Materials Limited's Motion to Dismiss [Dkt. No. 82] Pursuant to Local Rule 6-3 (Dkt No. 100). The Order continued the hearing on HBML's motion to dismiss from July 11, 2018, to September 12, 2018, and continued jurisdictional discovery and briefing deadlines in accordance with the new hearing date;

WHEREAS, the Parties have been actively meeting and conferring—both via telephone and email correspondence—with respect to those jurisdictional discovery requests propounded by Plaintiffs, Swagelok, Lozick, and Whitney on HBML;

WHEREAS, additional time would allow the Parties the opportunity to continue to meet and confer and hopefully reach informal resolution of all outstanding discovery issues;

WHEREAS, additional time also would allow sufficient time for Plaintiffs, Swagelok, Lozick, and Whitney to review any supplemental responses and production of documents by HBML, including documents that have only recently come into HBML's possession;

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs, Swagelok, Lozick, and Whitney assert that they continue to actively pursue their Rule 45 document subpoenas directed to Millennium Custodial Trust but still expect it will take approximately four to six week additional weeks to obtain responsive documents;

WHEREAS, additional time is needed to accommodate the summer travel plans of those individuals whose deposition will be taken in connection with HBML's motion to dismiss;

WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to commence depositions the last week of August 2018 through September 14, 2018, and HBML has agreed to make its deponents available in that time frame;

WHEREAS, counsel for HBML has contacted the courtroom clerk and October 31, 2018, appears to be an available hearing date;

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between and among Plaintiffs, Swagelok, Lozick, Whitney, and HBML that:

1. Any opposition(s) to HBML's Rule 12 motion by Plaintiffs, Swagelok, Lozick, and/or Whitney shall be filed on or before September 19, 2018;

2. Any reply(ies) by HBML in support of its Rule 12 motion shall be filed on or before October 15, 2018;

3. The Court's hearing on this matter shall be continued to October 31, 2018, at 2 p.m. in Courtroom 2;

4. The above dates are subject to modification only by Court Order and for good cause.

ORDER

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, the Court hereby adopts the above-referenced schedule as the Order of the Court.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, except as modified below, IT IS SO ORDERED: the hearing on the motion shall be on November 7, 2018 at 2 p.m.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer