STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO AND REPLY ISO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR., District Judge.

Plaintiffs Robin Berman, Bo Kang, Khashayar Mirfakhraei, Thang Van Vu, Donna Viera-Castillo, Girish Ramesh, Patrick Hanley, Ilana Shternshain and Mandy Schwarz (collectively "Plaintiffs") filed a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on July 2, 2018 and noticed the hearing for September 13, 2018 at 2:00 p.m.

Plaintiffs have agreed to extend the deadline for Defendants Microchip Technology Incorporated ("Microchip"), Atmel Corporation ("Atmel") and Atmel Corporation U.S. Severance Guarantee Benefit Program ("Severance Program" and, collectively with Microchip and Atmel, "Defendants") to respond to the Motion for Partial Summary Judgment until Monday, July 30, 2018. Defendants have similarly agreed to extend Plaintiffs' deadline to file their Reply in support of their Motion for Partial Summary Judgment to August 13, 2018, which would normally be due on August 6, 2018 under the local rules.

Accordingly, Plaintiffs and Defendants hereby stipulate, by and through their respective attorneys of record, that Defendants' time to file their Opposition to the Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is extended up to and including July 30, 2018 and Plaintiffs' time to file their Reply in Support of the Motion for Partial Summary Judgment extended up to and including August 13, 2018.

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

SIGNATURE ATTESTATION

In accordance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the signatories on this e-filed document, and that this attestation was executed on July 13, 2018.