Carter v. County of Alameda, 16-cv-05132-WHO. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20180718883
Visitors: 23
Filed: Jul. 17, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 17, 2018
Summary: ORDER OF DISMISSAL UPON SETTLEMENT Re: Dkt. No. 89 WILLIAM H. ORRICK , District Judge . The parties to the action, by and through their counsel, have advised the Court that they have agreed to a settlement. IT IS ORDERED that this matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. It is further ordered that if any party certifies to this Court, with proper notice to opposing counsel within sixty (60) days from the date below, that settlement has not in fact occurred, this order shall be vacated and this
Summary: ORDER OF DISMISSAL UPON SETTLEMENT Re: Dkt. No. 89 WILLIAM H. ORRICK , District Judge . The parties to the action, by and through their counsel, have advised the Court that they have agreed to a settlement. IT IS ORDERED that this matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. It is further ordered that if any party certifies to this Court, with proper notice to opposing counsel within sixty (60) days from the date below, that settlement has not in fact occurred, this order shall be vacated and this c..
More
ORDER OF DISMISSAL UPON SETTLEMENT
Re: Dkt. No. 89
WILLIAM H. ORRICK, District Judge.
The parties to the action, by and through their counsel, have advised the Court that they have agreed to a settlement. IT IS ORDERED that this matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. It is further ordered that if any party certifies to this Court, with proper notice to opposing counsel within sixty (60) days from the date below, that settlement has not in fact occurred, this order shall be vacated and this cause shall be restored to the calendar for further proceedings
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
