Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Certified Nutraceuticals, Inc. v. The Clorox Company, 18-CV-0744 W (KSC). (2018)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20180723765 Visitors: 13
Filed: Jul. 20, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 20, 2018
Summary: ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND TO STRIKE AS MOOT [DOCS. 9, 10] THOMAS J. WHELAN , District Judge . On June 11, 2018, Defendants filed motions to dismiss the complaint and to strike its prayer for punitive damages. [Docs. 9, 10.] 21 days later, on July 2, 2018, Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint ("FAC"). [Doc. 12.] A party may amend a complaint within 21 days of service of a responsive pleading. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1)(B). "It is well-established in our circu
More

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND TO STRIKE AS MOOT [DOCS. 9, 10]

On June 11, 2018, Defendants filed motions to dismiss the complaint and to strike its prayer for punitive damages. [Docs. 9, 10.] 21 days later, on July 2, 2018, Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint ("FAC"). [Doc. 12.]

A party may amend a complaint within 21 days of service of a responsive pleading. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1)(B). "It is well-established in our circuit that an `amended complaint supersedes the original, the latter being treated thereafter as non-existent.'" Ramirez v. Cty. of San Bernardino, 806 F.3d 1002, 1008 (9th Cir. 2015) (quoting Forsyth v. Humana, Inc., 114 F.3d 1467, 1474 (9th Cir. 1997)). Accordingly, when a plaintiff timely amends, the original complaint ceases to exist, and any pending motions to dismiss it are moot. See id.

In light of the filing of the FAC, the Court denies Defendants' motions [Doc. 9, 10] as moot.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer