Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

West v. California Service Bureau, Inc., 16-cv-03124-YGR. (2018)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20180724592 Visitors: 4
Filed: Jul. 23, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 23, 2018
Summary: ORDER CONTINUING COMPLIANCE HEARING Re: Dkt. No. 114 YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS , District Judge . The parties previously notified the Court that the above-captioned case had settled. (Dkt. No. 111.) To provide a method of tracking the case through its final disposition, on May 17, 2018 the Court set a compliance hearing for July 27, 2018. (Dkt. No. 112.) The Court's Order required the parties to file "either (a) a motion for preliminary approval of class settlement; or (b) a one-page JOINT S
More

ORDER CONTINUING COMPLIANCE HEARING

Re: Dkt. No. 114

The parties previously notified the Court that the above-captioned case had settled. (Dkt. No. 111.) To provide a method of tracking the case through its final disposition, on May 17, 2018 the Court set a compliance hearing for July 27, 2018. (Dkt. No. 112.) The Court's Order required the parties to file "either (a) a motion for preliminary approval of class settlement; or (b) a one-page JOINT STATEMENT setting forth an explanation regarding the failure to comply" at least five business days before the date of the compliance hearing. (Id. (emphasis in original).) On July 20, 2018, the parties filed a joint statement setting forth an explanation regarding their failure to comply. (Dkt. No. 114.)

The Court CONTINUES the compliance hearing to its 9:01 a.m. Calendar on Friday, August 10, 2018 in Courtroom 1 of the United States Courthouse located at 1301 Clay Street in Oakland, California. By Friday, August 3, 2018, the parties shall file either (a) a motion for preliminary approval of class settlement; or (b) a one-page JOINT STATEMENT setting forth an explanation regarding the failure to comply. If compliance is complete, the parties need not appear and the compliance hearing will be taken off calendar. Telephonic appearances will be allowed if the parties have submitted a joint statement in a timely fashion.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer