U.S. v. Martin, 18CR2835-GPC. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20180724629
Visitors: 16
Filed: Jul. 20, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 20, 2018
Summary: ORDER GONZALO P. CURIEL , District Judge . The United States of America and defendant JOHNNY MARTIN jointly move to exclude time under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. 3161(h)(7). For reasons stated in paragraph 3 of the joint motion, incorporated by reference herein, the Court finds the ends of justice served by granting the requested continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. The Court also declares the case complex under 18 U.S.C. 3161(h
Summary: ORDER GONZALO P. CURIEL , District Judge . The United States of America and defendant JOHNNY MARTIN jointly move to exclude time under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. 3161(h)(7). For reasons stated in paragraph 3 of the joint motion, incorporated by reference herein, the Court finds the ends of justice served by granting the requested continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. The Court also declares the case complex under 18 U.S.C. 3161(h)..
More
ORDER
GONZALO P. CURIEL, District Judge.
The United States of America and defendant JOHNNY MARTIN jointly move to exclude time under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7).
For reasons stated in paragraph 3 of the joint motion, incorporated by reference herein, the Court finds the ends of justice served by granting the requested continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. The Court also declares the case complex under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(ii).
IT IS ORDERED that the period of delay from the filing of the joint motion until the date of the next hearing shall be excluded in computing the time within which the trial must commence under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161.
Source: Leagle
