Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Zayas v. Ortega, 17-cv-02739-EMC. (2018)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20180725901 Visitors: 12
Filed: Jul. 24, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 24, 2018
Summary: ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO SUBMIT ADDITIONAL BRIEFING Docket No. 67 EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . Plaintiff has asked for leave to file a supplemental brief to discuss a Ninth Circuit decision issued after the summary judgment reply briefs were filed. See Shorter v. Baca, No. 16-56051, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 19491 (9th Cir. July 16, 2018). Plaintiff's motion is denied. Under Civil Local Rule 7-3(d), "[o]nce a reply is filed, no additional memoranda, pa
More

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO SUBMIT ADDITIONAL BRIEFING

Docket No. 67

Plaintiff has asked for leave to file a supplemental brief to discuss a Ninth Circuit decision issued after the summary judgment reply briefs were filed. See Shorter v. Baca, No. 16-56051, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 19491 (9th Cir. July 16, 2018). Plaintiff's motion is denied. Under Civil Local Rule 7-3(d), "[o]nce a reply is filed, no additional memoranda, papers or letters may be filed without prior Court approval, except," e.g., "[b]efore the noticed hearing date, counsel may bring to the Court's attention a relevant judicial opinion published after the date the opposition or reply was filed by filing and serving a Statement of Recent Decision, containing a citation to and providing a copy of the new opinion — without argument." Civ. L.R. 7-3(d). The Court therefore shall not permit Plaintiff to file a supplemental brief. However, it shall take into account the Shorter decision cited by Plaintiff.

This order disposes of Docket No. 67.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer