Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. Jakubec, 10cr4828-LAB. (2018)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20180725940 Visitors: 14
Filed: Jul. 24, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 24, 2018
Summary: ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY LARRY ALAN BURNS , District Judge . Three months ago, the Court denied George Jakubec's motion to vacate his 30-year sentence for armed bank robbery under 18 U.S.C. 924(c). Jackubec can appeal that order only if he's "made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 28 U.S.C. 2253; United States v. Asrar, 116 F.3d 1268 , 1270 (9th Cir. 1997). He hasn't made such a showing for the reasons discussed in the Court's previous
More

ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

Three months ago, the Court denied George Jakubec's motion to vacate his 30-year sentence for armed bank robbery under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c). Jackubec can appeal that order only if he's "made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 28 U.S.C. § 2253; United States v. Asrar, 116 F.3d 1268, 1270 (9th Cir. 1997). He hasn't made such a showing for the reasons discussed in the Court's previous order. In short, Jackubec argued § 924(c)'s residual clause defined "crime of violence" in unconstitutionally vague terms. But under § 924(c)'s force clause, armed bank robbery is categorically a crime of violence. United States v. Watson, 881 F.3d 782, 786 (9th Cir. 2018). Since Jackubec was convicted and sentenced under the force clause, he hasn't made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer